Comments on: What If You Don’t Need ‘Development’? http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2009/01/05/what-if-you-dont-need-development/ Biking in the Bay Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Commonwealth Club http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2009/01/05/what-if-you-dont-need-development/#comment-3778 Commonwealth Club Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:27:23 +0000 http://bikeblogs.org/sf/?p=809#comment-3778 Thought you folks might like to see this exploration of the City's bike policy... Hosted by the Guardian's own editorial messenger, Steve Jones http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a0RpfOA3kA Enjoy! Thought you folks might like to see this exploration of the City’s bike policy…
Hosted by the Guardian’s own editorial messenger, Steve Jones

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a0RpfOA3kA

Enjoy!

]]> By: Dave Reid http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2009/01/05/what-if-you-dont-need-development/#comment-3473 Dave Reid Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:49:27 +0000 http://bikeblogs.org/sf/?p=809#comment-3473 I'd say that rail combined with good TOD has a better chance of getting people out of their cars, at least some of the time, then a rail corridor that requires people to drive to the station. So TOD has a purpose beyond just better more organized development but it actually helps reducing the number of vehicle trips taken. I’d say that rail combined with good TOD has a better chance of getting people out of their cars, at least some of the time, then a rail corridor that requires people to drive to the station. So TOD has a purpose beyond just better more organized development but it actually helps reducing the number of vehicle trips taken.

]]>